Tyler (Everything)

20Oct/090

Non-Review: New Apple iMacs

iMac Ports

iMac Ports

The 21.5" iMac falls into the same category as all the other old iMacs; cute but stupid. Now the 27" iMac... that is a completely different beast!

Apple got the 27" incredibly right on this release by adding a feature that no one is talking about but has been demanded by fans for years.

So there is tons of new stuff about the iMac... and a quick google search will find you almost everyone's opinion on it. The gist of it is that it has gone from a 4x3 screen to a 16:9 screen, sizes have gone from 20" and 24" to 21.5" and 27" and the screen now uses the same kickass IPS panels as the new 24" cinema display.

So why is this 27" so great where as the former iMacs and the 21.5" are lacking. Well the main thing to remember is that when you buy an iMac you are getting a decent desktop with a great monitor. (Some may not like the Apple displays because of the glossyzzle and other such reasons, but then you don't care at all). The big issue is that the monitor on the iMac is not really monitor at all, but a dedicated display for the desktop. That doesn't help say my MacBook Pro which I would love to have a kickass external display for.

Well the 27" iMac solves this issue. In the fine print it states: 27-inch models also support input from external DisplayPort sources (adapters sold separately). So the 27" model lets you plug in an external machine and utilize the monitor that you just paid big bucks for. This is very good news.

Now it is limited to MiniDisplay Port sources, which is far from great, but nevertheless this is a move in the right direction. When you consider that the 24" Cinema Display is $999 and now you can get a 27" Display for $1799 (with a computer attached), it actually looks like a pretty sweet deal, or at least not a bad deal.

Filed under: Technology No Comments
24Aug/094

Brake Lights Need A New Design

I read tons of stuff outlining new and innovative designs. I should be writing about one of those ideas, but being that I would much rather complain than gush, I will explain why brake light design sucks.

Yesterday I was driving home from southern Ontario, and as always the further you get into eastern Ontario the quality of the driving goes further into the shitty mess range of the spectrum.  I was following one guy who seemed to brake every 10-15 seconds. The car in front of him was braking and he would barely slow down. After a few minutes of this I figured he was either resting his left foot on the brake peddle or was absolutely paranoid. Being unable to pass because of the traffic I accepted his incompetence and when he would brake I would left off the accelerator since he was not really braking. Well that was all well and good until he really did slow down. I almost ended up parked in his trunk. Luckily I did not, but it left me thinking that an on/off night is not appropriate for brakes.

Instead of a simple bi-modal light I think that the brightness of the brake light should be related to the intensity of the braking action. It would give you a clearer indication of what the idiot in front of you is doing, and more quickly alert you to upcoming dangers.

Along the slightly different lines, brake lights should not be limited to the rear of the car. When you are at a yellow light and looking to turn left it would be nice to know whether the oncoming vehicles are braking or have just mashed down on the accelerators to try to make it through the light. It would give you a much clearer indication of what oncoming cars are doing.

If car companies are serious about making cars safer, then forget turning the car into one giant air bag instead give us a clearer indication of what the surrounding  jackasses are doing.

Filed under: Technology 4 Comments
29May/094

BGI: Picking A Browser

The largest market share of browser's hitting this website is Internet Explorer! 38% of all visits to this website are with Internet Explorer, Firefox is next with 35%, then Safari at 12%. I hate the fact that Internet Explorer is still winning! I crave the day when I check these stats and see something, ANYTHING other than IE. Having said that I should point out that I am actually doing pretty well. In the wild and not using this website as a reference, IE holds about a 66% market share. This number needs to change, especially in regards to IE 6.

Internet Explorer 6 was released on August 27, 2001. That is roughly 8 years ago. It was not a particularly great browser when it was released but due to Microsoft Bundling it with Windows it eventually won out against Netscape. In its peak in 2002-03 it had market share in the high 80s. Now it dwindles for good reason in the less than 20% range. Yet in the corporate world, it is still used extensively. In fact I still have IE6 (along with 3 other browsers) installed on my computer at work.

At this point I cannot fathom how people still use IE6. It is a hideous browser, to compare it to an Automobile that was released in the same year. It is a Pontiac Aztec:

Pontiac Aztec

Pontiac Aztec

Now an alternative would be Firefox 3.0. It is a good deal faster, with much richer features. It is a safer browser and better yet it is free! Would you rather drive a 2001 Pontiac Aztec or would you rather drive this (keeping in mind that it is free!):

BMW M3

BMW M3

Well 66% of all people are still driving the Aztec. Now since I have slammed IE enough I should go into greater detail as to why it sucks, and give some alternatives.

Firefox 3.0

This looks to be the current favourite to unseat Internet Explorer as the browser champion. In its current state, it is hard to question Firefox's supremacy in the browser race.  Firefox is based off the old open source code base of the now defunct Netscape project.

Firefox has a lot going for it. It is a very fast browser, especially in comparison to IE. It should be getting even faster after the upcoming release of FireFox 3.5, which should come with the TraceMonkey JavaScript engine enabled. Yet if you are looking for pure speed, Firefox is not the king. Where FireFox wins hands down, is its extensibility.

Firefox has a vast theme and plugin catalog (created by everyday users) to be able to make the browser do whatever you want it to do. The Firefox themes allow you to change the appearance of the browser to suit your personal tastes.

Beyond the appearance, the plugins capability of Firefox, allows you to add functionality to suit your needs. Email notifier? Yep Gmail notifier handles that. Ad Block Plus blocks ads. GMarks integrates with you Google Bookmarks. The list is never ending, there is a Better Gmail plugin, that ads features to Gmail. Plugins for improving google reader, links to del-i-cious, digg, you name it. You  can make firefox do pretty much anything you want, and that is its strength.

Most importantlyFirefox is standards based. This means that it renders web pages to look the way a published set of standards dictate they should look. Differences from the published standards are treated as bugs by the Firefox developers.

Also important to note is that Firefox is available on all computing platforms.

Google Chrome

Google Chrome is in it's infancy. It was only released in beta form in September of 2008. It has a singular goal in optimizing browser performance to bring web-apps to the desktop. Google has a great deal invested in web applications (Google Docs, GMail, etc...) and to make them truly compete with desktop applications they felt they needed a faster browser; which is exactly what Google Chrome is.

Chrome has far and away the fastest Javascript engine on the market (name V8). The javascript processing time of a browser is crucial to the performance of the newer web applications. Beyond that there are many other advancements. The name chrome comes from the fact that that is exactly what it is lacking, the chrome. It tries to give as much content as possible content of websites as opposed to the browser itself. As well each tab in the browser operates in a seperate process. This means that if a bit of bad javascript crashes the browser, in Chrome it will only crash the single tab, rather than all existing tabs.

Chrome's biggest short comings are the strengths of Firefox. It lacks customizability, although a plugin in frastructure is coming. As well for the time being it is only available on Windoze although OS X and linux versions are in the pipeline.

Regardless of the current small market share of Chrome, I think that it actually has the best shot of unseeding IE. Google is pushing this browser very hard, they have taken it out of the beta state remarkably quickly for a Google product. They are marketing it a huge amount; they are even rumoured to be taking out television ads. Beyond the advertising they are said to be negotiating with computer manufacturers to OEM Chrome, which would be a major coup against IE.

Chrome is my browser of choice on Windoze.

Safari

Safari is Apple's answer to the browser. It started out as being OS X only, but has now been extended to the windows platform. Like Firefox and Chrome it is standards based, as well it is a very fast browser, yet it does not compete with Chrome. Yet it is faster than Firefox on OS X, and very comparable on Windoze.

Where Safari lacks, is it does not seem to be a polished application on the Windoze platform, and it lacks the extensibility of Firefox. Safari is very close to being my browser of choice on OS X, but with the upcoming version of Firefox, I think  I will continue with it.

Internet Explorer

Saving the worst piece of shit for last. This browser is everything that is wrong with the internet, and it is leading the downfall of Microsoft. The only thing that is has going for it is the update infrastructure being tied in with Windows Update so that it can be pushed to the client in a corporate setting. Other than that! It's a nightmare.

Is it standards based? Nope. Internet Explorer says FUCK YOU to standards. You create a website according to the web standards and it will work in Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera, ... pretty much every browser EXCEPT IE. You need to put in all kinds of conditional work to make the website look good in Internet Explorer.

Is it fast? Nope, one of the slowest browsers on the market.

Is it extensible? There is a growing amount of plugins, but it is extremely limited in comparison to Firefox.

Available on all platforms? Nope it is windoze only. A few years back there was an attempt to create a Mac version, but that one was even more fucked up then the windows version.

So with all the shittyness spewing out of IE why does it have the most market share? The easy answer: People are too stupid/lazy to download a far superior browser. I have high hopes that when Chrome starts being bundled on OEM machines (hopefully Dell and HP) then we may see IE die the death it so richly deserves.

In short, when picking a browser pick ANYTHING except Internet Explorer!

15May/091

Google Bookmarks

I am going to be writing a little bit about things that I have found that make my life easier. This is one google product that I have been using and loving , yet it doesn't seem to get any publicity;  it's Google Bookmarks.

I had been looking for a while for a way to handle my bookmarks. There are options out there. Apple's MobileMe will sync your bookmarks to the cloud, but it didn't seem to have a solution with Windows (and thus my work machines),  there are tons of linking services; Digg, Delicious, etc... But those were all social bookmarking. I wanted something that was in the cloud, that was private, easily organizable. I thought to myself: Why the hell does Google not do bookmarks?!?!? Which led me to wonder if they did.

I did a quick search for 'Google Bookmarks' and sure enough there it is! It lacks the spit and polish of most of their products, but it is quickly working its way up my favorite products list. You see I was sick and tired of emailing myself links that I found at work, or at other's computers. It would be something like, see an interesting link off a blog, follow a few more pages, bam! This is a great tutorial! Now I need to get that tutorial to somewhere I will remember it, and that I could easily find it again. That was done through tags in Google Reader or through emailing it to myself, both of whice were crappy solutions.

Now I just use Google's booksmarks service. The key is placing a link (this one: Bookmark This Page - you can just drag it to your bar), in your bookmark bar in your browser. When you click it, it will open a dialog box with the information of the current page in it. You can add coma seperated tags, and add a description. Clicking OK adds it to your bookmarks, which is accessible at: http://www.google.com/bookmarks/. This gives you a similar searching and browsing structure as GMail.

I absolutely love that I have all my bookmarks with me at all times. It is also very very easy to add a new link to the system. It really is a simple yet elegant solution to my problem. Are there are any other solutions that you like? This may not be typical Google clean, but it certainly the best solution that I have found.

20Feb/091

So Pissed At IE!

Why the hell does Internet Explorer never fucking work?

Ever!

Gah. Honestly, I am thinking of blocking IE from viewing this site! Opinions?

Filed under: Technology 1 Comment
9Jan/090

You Might Be A Donkey Nut If…

So today I lost my mind on Internet Explorer so I thought I would start my first ever list of... YOU MIGHT BE A DONKEY NUT IF!

You might be a donkey nut if...

  • You regularly use Internet Explorer! There are many MANY far superior browsers... There really is NO excuse
  • You use MSN. MSN is ranked at number 2 or 3 in my list of the worst software ever created
  • You have an MSN account and never had an ICQ account!
  • You still use hotmail... Comon GMAIL!
  • You can't see that Twitter is superior to Facebook
  • You hate Microsoft because they are Microsoft, but use MSN anyway
  • You don't use Google Reader!
  • RSS means nothing to you
  • You own a Wii... Yarr
  • You hate Apple for being too cool, rather than being too expensive
  • You regularly use Internet Explorer... WHY?!??!?!
  • You think HTML is 'code'

This is a solid start for now. I can feel it... This will not be the last version of You Might Be A Donkey Nut If...

Filed under: Technology No Comments
8Jan/090

Google Calendar Utopia

The requests have been made. And now I respond, this is how my Google Calendar utopia has emerged.

My search for a ubiquitous solution emerged when I got an iPhone and realized that Google Calendar had next to no support. Mobile Me had its own very cool push calendar, but that means nothing if its tough to use. I hated the fact that I couldn't respond to invitations from other people, as well at the time I didn't have a Mac, so without iCal, I was limited to the MobileMe web interface, which to put it plainly is a glorious hunk of crap.

What I really wanted was a good gCal solution. Finally I found one! All hail www.NuevaSync.com. Now there were some bugs, but it is pretty much problem free now. What NuevaSync is, is a proxy program that hooks into Google Calendar and mimics an Exchange Server calendar, which do have excellent support! This gives you true push of gCal, as well NuevaSync also has push Google Contacts. I must say the service has been great.

One of my favorite aspects of NuevaSync is that you do not provide NuevaSync with your Google credentials, rather you give them your accountID (email address), and they try to contact Google, at which point Google asks you to authorize and and provides Nueva with a token. Very cool.

As far as problems, the only issue that I have right now, is that if I move a recurring appointment it seems to end up with 2 copies on my phone. Not terrible. The nicest thing, is that the notification timing from Google is honoured on the phone.

...OH... And it's free, that might actually be the best part of it!

Strangely enough this is not where the utopia ends. To really pull it all together, Google now supports a cloud style feed to iCal. You can get more details here. Needless to say all of my calendar data is stored in Google, and through various different mechanisms it is available in 2 very conveniant applications. I must say this integration is what I really want it to be.

Now if only I can find a way to get such nice integration with gMail. Sigh.

15Dec/080

A Rocky Start

So previously I bantered back and forth on the idea of ordering a MacBook Pro. Well last Monday I pulled the trigger and ordered it. How is it? How the hell should I know? Where is it? Again, how the hell should I know?

ÜPS (pronounced OOOOoops) has been doing their best to make this a supreme cluster fuck. Honestly I have no idea how ÜPS has avoided being on THE LIST! this long. But well they are at the top of the pile right now!

Here is the current timeline, and why I am losing my mind:

  • Monday - Dec 8th: Our hero (me) places order
  • Wednesday - Dec 10th: Apple transfers billing info to ÜPS
  • Wednesday - Dec 10th: ÜPS receives package - in Shanghai. ÜPS marks package as "On Time - Delivery Dec 16th".
  • Wednesday - Dec 10th: Hero books water meter repair to conincide with MBP delivery on Dec 16th
  • Thursday - Dec 11th: Export scan. 
  • Thursday - Dec 12th: ÜPS marks package as "On Time - Delivery Dec 17th". Well its not on time anymore is it? Once it goes from the 16th to 17th it is now LATE!
  • Friday - Dec 12th: MBP leaves Shanghai. Did it honestly just take 2 days for it to leave once ÜPS had it?
  • Thursday - Dec 11th: MBP arrives in Anchorage AK. Ok so this is just some timezone trickery.  It left early in the morning on the 12th and arrived at 8pm AK time in Alaska.
  • Friday - Dec 12th: Expected delivery date removed.
  • Saturday - Dec 13th: Nothing.
  • Sunday - Dec 14th: Nothing.
  • Monday - Dec 15th (so far): Nothing.

For all I know its still in AK. It hasn't moved in the better part of 4 days. Delivery info is gone from the tracking update page. Just nothing. I have no idea whether it will arrive this week or not. For the record, when I ordered Apple said it would arrive between the 11th (long gone) and the 18th. I am about 1 hour without update from phoning ÜPS to ask what the hell is going on.

21Nov/081

Things Have Changed.

I can't believe the current predicament. I am angry with myself. I am angry with myself, and I'm in pain because I just stabbed myself in the hand.

I can't believe I am saying this, but I am considering buying an Apple PC. Ok I said that before. I'm still in a bit of shock, but I'm considering getting an apple *sigh* laptop. Honestly what is wrong with me? I hate Apple, I hate laptops. This makes no sense. 

Well I don' t hate Apple, but I hate the Apple Tax. You know, that thing where all their computers cost 33% more than they should? Now I hate laptops too... They never seem to perform as well as their desktop counterparts. Smaller cases, more heat problems... It's just a fact of life. Couple that with costing double... Death to notebooks!

So what has me in this current predicament of bowing to everything I hate? It's the current state of the computing world I would say. 

Here is the state of my world:

  • I need a new computer, and probably sooner rather than later... This one is weezing... Honest to goodness weezing. I can hear it right now. This all started about a year and a half ago when I went to plug in an a USB drive, and there was a spark. Since then USB has been flaky... And memory has been flaky. On a few occasions I have had to swap the positions of the two sticks of RAM because the sizes are changing... Bad sign! And this was all before the lightning strike earlier this summer. Needless to say, its time.
  • Last season I went back to coaching at Mont Ste Marie. This means being away on weekend in the winter. Couple that with spending ever more time at the cottage in the summer and well, a laptop makes more and more sense. Especially from the idea of being able to edit video on weekends and holidays to show to athletes. I am wavering and feeling like a laptop may be the best bet. I'll come back to this...
  • Apple... Why thee of expensive aluminum chiseled case. Well there are a few reasons. First there are only 5 things I wish to be able to do on my home computer:
    1. Surf the web
    2. Edit photos
    3. Edit videos
    4. Run Apache/MySQL/PHP (AMP sounds cooler)
    5. iTunes to sync my phone/listen to music

    As well as those 5 things, I would like to run a 64 bit OS. What are the options for 64 bit computing? Really there are 3: Vista, OS X, various Linux flavours (Ubuuntu). Scratch linux for media editing. Next scratch Vista for being a piece of shit. Maybe I should tell a quick (and recent) Vista story:

    Alanna's parents just got a new computer from Dell. It came with Vista home. Her dad unbeknownst to him was the system admin, her mom just a regular user. Her mom wanted to be able to play some games from msngames.com. These games require installing an archaic ActiveX plugin. She tried to install the plugin, but it told her that she needed to be logged in as the administrator, and popped up a dialog with her husband's login, and a blank password field. Neither of them had any idea what the password could be and were left confused. This is where I enter to save the day... Or just get furiously annoyed.
    I go with my gut, and figure that the password is probably just blank. Click OK. Yep that works... We are installing! Hoorah! Vista ain't so bad... I have this licked. But wait, after the download completes, McAfee (also terrible I might add) pops up and says that this Microsoft signed ActiveX control can nay be trusted. And gives two options: Delete the foul code. Leave the foul code on the machine.
    There seems to be an option missing to run the foul code. I try to find this option. It's not there. I try to disable McAfee, also not an option.
    *Sigh*
    Logout, log into Vista/Crap (any clever ways to combine those two words would be appreciated right now!) as the admin user. At this point, I can disable McAfee and get everything installed. But as an experiment, I decide to run the same flow... Install Active X yadda... yadda... yadda... This time McAfee gives the option to run the foul signed Microsoft Active X control. This must be an Admin Only option. Needless to say I got the simple game working, after mucking with it for about 30 minutes.
    The flaw in the logic is that if you are smart and not running as the admin, you can not simply run an installer as the administrator and be done with it, because the virus scanner (that is not running as an Admin) can block that. Which requires logging out, installing the software as Admin... Re-assuring the virus scanner that it is alright, then logging back in as joe user and potentially re-installing the software (which is now trusted) under your profile.
    It's bad. That is all I can say. The solution for Alanna's parents? They are now both Admins, and their machine running a very secure Vista is now less secure, because they both have full access. Crappy solution.

    So long story short. Let me state here and now, loud and proud. I will never own a machine with Vista. (Windows 7... uggghhh maybe).

  • Well crap... After that I can barely remember any of my other reasons! That is Microsoft's ploy! Oh wait, I have it! Back to why a laptop. As you can see, I have to buy an Apple, so now its back to Apple doesn't make a desktop that suits me. Either very expensive, Mac Pro, under-powered Mac Mini, or just right iMac. Accept the iMac isn't just right. It's a glorified laptop sitting on a pedestel. It doesn't have the benefits of a real desktop, more space, better heat reduction, not forcing you to buy a laptop. So that brings me back to the MacBook Pro. The power of a iMac (pretty much), the price of the too Mac Pro, but the portability that I somehow rationalized earlier in this overly long and annoying blog post.

So there you have it. I hate laptops, I hate Apple, and I'm probably going to be buying a MacBook Pro. I'm such a hypocrit. I hate this feeling, but at this point, I must say to all you Mac fanboys who I have ragged on for all these years... You still may not have been right... But neither was I. 

As an aside: I'm test driving a new layout... I'm not sure I like it.

Tagged as: 1 Comment
22Oct/081

Mac Mini = Dead. Do I get my wish?

The Mac Mini is dead. Now are they going to replace it? And will their replacement be exactly what I am looking for? Well if I were designing my very own Mac here is what it would look like.

It would cost $1400-1800 (CDN - which I need to specify since the Canuckian dollar is falling again).

It would have this case:

And it would be speced like this

Actually I prefer to see one of the new Intel Core2Quads, around 2.6-2.8 GHz and a 4gigs of ram and 750MB hard drive.

What are the chances that Apple delivers on my wishes? About as much chance as the iPhone having push GMail before 2009! Damn near none.

I really hope that Apple does choose to somewhat close my perceived gap in their Mac line. Of course it still does not guarantee that I will be willing to pay the 'Apple Tax'. Still they should try!

Filed under: Technology 1 Comment