Tyler (Everything)

10Mar/100

SSD For Laptop

I would love to have a SSD for my laptop, but unfortunately that just isn't in the realm of my pocket book. 512gb drives are still in excess of $1000 at the low end! Ugggh.

Here is something that I may try to get me a speed boost for a few hundred dollars:

8Mar/100

Monitor Confusion

A little while ago I wrote a bit about my search for a new monitor. I basically conceded that waiting for the Dell u2711 to drop in price to the $700-800 (it is still shockingly high at $1249).

Now I find out from a semi reliable source, that the Dell u2410 will be dropping in price this Wednesday to a very low $419 as part of Dell's March Madness promotion. That is a helluva lot less than the $800 that I am waiting for the 2711 to drop to.

An interesting comparison based on the 16x9 aspect ratio of the 2711 and the 16x10 aspect ratio of the 2410.

The screen height is actually very similar between the two:

27" (16x9) vs 24" (16x10)

27" (16x9) vs 24" (16x10)

So the question is more about the 1920x1200 vs 2560x1440 and whether that is worth waiting for the better aspect ratio to drop to double the price. I think I am going to jump on the u2410 on Wednesday.

I know that it does have some documented issues, but not many of those seem to be reported by North American users. If its an issue I will simply return it.

Filed under: Technology No Comments
5Mar/100

ToDo: TeuxDeux

TeuxDeux

TeuxDeux

Alright, so it has a stupid name. TeuxDeux.com should not (and for me will not) be pronounced ToDo. Anyone who has spent anytime around the French language knows that deux (which is the number 2) is not pronounced do. It is pronounced something more along the lines of d-ugh, which I am guessing that it is not what the creator of the site was going for. Anyway, misname aside I will give a brief review of the site.

The site does exactly what you would think it would do, it creates a list and lets you cross stuff off. Having said that, it is missing many things that a fully functional ToDo app needs.

What it does

  • Lists item per day or 'someday'
  • If an item has not been completed by a given day, it moves it to the next day
  • Provides you with a simple and attractive layout that makes it easy to manage items
  • Easily lets you drag items from one day to the next

What it lacks

  • Scrolling through days of days is tedious adding a '>>' (jump week) to the '>' jump day would be wonderful
  • Adding notes to items would be most convenient
  • Multiple lists would also be great
  • A mobile solution (the FAQ says one is coming)
  • Setting a specified time to an item is a must in my book
  • As well it needs notifications (email/pop-up)

Verdict

I love the minimalistic feel, and there is supposed to be many more features coming, but for the time being it doesn't fulfill all the required needs of a good ToDo app.

19Feb/103

Answering The Age Old Question: Dell u2711 or Apple iMac27

Dell u2711

Dell u2711

It is time for me to get a new monitor. My 22" at home is pretty beat up. The amount of backlight bleed is terrible, there are several stuck pixels, including a green one right smack in the middle of the panel that drives me nuts! As well there is real image consistency issues. All this to say I need a new panel.

There are a few that I am considering but I would really like a >=27" IPS panel, with resolution greater > 1920x1200.

When you get into this space, there is really only a two.

There is the new Dell u2711, which has great reviews, but is very pricey for what you get ($1250 regular price).

The other option is actually to buy the new 27" iMac from Apple. For the first time they added a display input to it, so it can be used as both a computer and an external display. I just noticed one on the refurb site (and based on the issues so far, there are going to be lots of refurbs coming) for $1550.

Now I figure that I will see the Dell go on sale (at some point) for about $899, yet that is just a guess. Right now between the two I get an almost identical panel and for $300 extra with the Apple I get a decent computer slapped on the back of one.

Still dropping this kind of cash on a monitor is tough.

One final option is the Dell u2410 which is very similar to the u2711. It is regular $750, but semi frequently goes on sale for $499, which is quite reasonable. Still the 1920x1200 resolution leaves me wanting in comparison to the 2560x1440 of the 27" panels.

Now one of the reasons that I am looking for such a large screen is because I miss having a true dual monitor setup when using my MBP. I could go for 2 24" panels and go with this hacked together version of dual monitors for the MBP: MacBook Pro with Dual Monitors.

At the moment I am leaning towards the iMac, since being able to cluster video rendering would be pretty awesome, but the price tag is kinda tough to swallow.

Now if the u2711 drops to say $799 I am all over it, but I fear that I will probably just purchase the u2410 the next time it falls to $499 and consider a second one at some point. Please feel free to tell me why I am stupid, and what I should do to be smarter about all this.

Filed under: Technology 3 Comments
29Jan/102

iPad Version 1.0 = Nope!

I have been digesting the release of the iPad for a few days now, and let me say my first impression is not magical.

After all the hype leading into a the tablet release I figured it would either be a big win or a big loss. Somehow it has come out as neither. Let me go through some initial impressions (keeping in mind I haven't touched the thing, and that seems to be the real factor in Apple product design).

  • The name sucks. Someone should be fired for iPad. iTablet, iSlate, iBigiPodTouch! Ok maybe the last one is worse
  • It looks like it should be awesome for web surfing, mobile device that has room for real websites
    • IT CAN'T USE REAL WEBSITES BECAUSE IT DOESN'T HAVE FLASH SUPPORT!
  • It attempts to be a game changer for eBooks, but I can't see myself reading a full book on a backlighted device. I still like the idea of e-ink
  • Battery life = 10 hours of video watching! WOW
  • Video output = VGA?!?!?! Seriously?
  • Support for bluetooth keyboard is awesome, very smart move by Apple
  • No multitasking? I actually think that this one will be dealt with with the release of iPhone OS 4.0, but until then... nope.
  • Looks awesome for watching video.
    • It is seriously crippled for watching web video (cept for Vimeo, and YouTube)... NO FLASH!
  • I am impressed that they can sell it for $499
  • IPS capacitive display, they can't be making much money on this thing
  • The hands on videos make it look very responsive as opposed to my iPhone 3G (no S)
  • The UI is a bag of crap. It looks like they are running the iPhone OS on a device it wasn't designed for... Oh wait that is what they are doing.
  • The apps they have redesigned for the iPad (contacts, maps, mail) look quite good!

All in all I'm not buying this version of the iPad. Our household has 2 iPhones, and 1 MacBook Pro. To be honest there is a perfect position in the household for a device of this sort. When I am gone with the laptop it would be good if the house had something better than an iPhone for checking email/web. Unfortunately with some of the very blatant limitations the iPad is not a significant enough improvement over the iPhone to justify the purchase.

Perhaps the next version of it that will no doubt deal with a lot of these issues, but not version 1.0. This reminds me of the original iPhone launch. $599 for the 4GB version. 3 months later the 4GB version was gone and the 8GB was selling for $399. Maybe then... If it gets (limited) multitasking and flash and a better UI.

All these things should be solvable with the release of OS 4.0

Tagged as: , , 2 Comments
20Oct/090

Non-Review: New Apple iMacs

iMac Ports

iMac Ports

The 21.5" iMac falls into the same category as all the other old iMacs; cute but stupid. Now the 27" iMac... that is a completely different beast!

Apple got the 27" incredibly right on this release by adding a feature that no one is talking about but has been demanded by fans for years.

So there is tons of new stuff about the iMac... and a quick google search will find you almost everyone's opinion on it. The gist of it is that it has gone from a 4x3 screen to a 16:9 screen, sizes have gone from 20" and 24" to 21.5" and 27" and the screen now uses the same kickass IPS panels as the new 24" cinema display.

So why is this 27" so great where as the former iMacs and the 21.5" are lacking. Well the main thing to remember is that when you buy an iMac you are getting a decent desktop with a great monitor. (Some may not like the Apple displays because of the glossyzzle and other such reasons, but then you don't care at all). The big issue is that the monitor on the iMac is not really monitor at all, but a dedicated display for the desktop. That doesn't help say my MacBook Pro which I would love to have a kickass external display for.

Well the 27" iMac solves this issue. In the fine print it states: 27-inch models also support input from external DisplayPort sources (adapters sold separately). So the 27" model lets you plug in an external machine and utilize the monitor that you just paid big bucks for. This is very good news.

Now it is limited to MiniDisplay Port sources, which is far from great, but nevertheless this is a move in the right direction. When you consider that the 24" Cinema Display is $999 and now you can get a 27" Display for $1799 (with a computer attached), it actually looks like a pretty sweet deal, or at least not a bad deal.

Filed under: Technology No Comments
24Aug/094

Brake Lights Need A New Design

I read tons of stuff outlining new and innovative designs. I should be writing about one of those ideas, but being that I would much rather complain than gush, I will explain why brake light design sucks.

Yesterday I was driving home from southern Ontario, and as always the further you get into eastern Ontario the quality of the driving goes further into the shitty mess range of the spectrum.  I was following one guy who seemed to brake every 10-15 seconds. The car in front of him was braking and he would barely slow down. After a few minutes of this I figured he was either resting his left foot on the brake peddle or was absolutely paranoid. Being unable to pass because of the traffic I accepted his incompetence and when he would brake I would left off the accelerator since he was not really braking. Well that was all well and good until he really did slow down. I almost ended up parked in his trunk. Luckily I did not, but it left me thinking that an on/off night is not appropriate for brakes.

Instead of a simple bi-modal light I think that the brightness of the brake light should be related to the intensity of the braking action. It would give you a clearer indication of what the idiot in front of you is doing, and more quickly alert you to upcoming dangers.

Along the slightly different lines, brake lights should not be limited to the rear of the car. When you are at a yellow light and looking to turn left it would be nice to know whether the oncoming vehicles are braking or have just mashed down on the accelerators to try to make it through the light. It would give you a much clearer indication of what oncoming cars are doing.

If car companies are serious about making cars safer, then forget turning the car into one giant air bag instead give us a clearer indication of what the surrounding  jackasses are doing.

Filed under: Technology 4 Comments
29May/094

BGI: Picking A Browser

The largest market share of browser's hitting this website is Internet Explorer! 38% of all visits to this website are with Internet Explorer, Firefox is next with 35%, then Safari at 12%. I hate the fact that Internet Explorer is still winning! I crave the day when I check these stats and see something, ANYTHING other than IE. Having said that I should point out that I am actually doing pretty well. In the wild and not using this website as a reference, IE holds about a 66% market share. This number needs to change, especially in regards to IE 6.

Internet Explorer 6 was released on August 27, 2001. That is roughly 8 years ago. It was not a particularly great browser when it was released but due to Microsoft Bundling it with Windows it eventually won out against Netscape. In its peak in 2002-03 it had market share in the high 80s. Now it dwindles for good reason in the less than 20% range. Yet in the corporate world, it is still used extensively. In fact I still have IE6 (along with 3 other browsers) installed on my computer at work.

At this point I cannot fathom how people still use IE6. It is a hideous browser, to compare it to an Automobile that was released in the same year. It is a Pontiac Aztec:

Pontiac Aztec

Pontiac Aztec

Now an alternative would be Firefox 3.0. It is a good deal faster, with much richer features. It is a safer browser and better yet it is free! Would you rather drive a 2001 Pontiac Aztec or would you rather drive this (keeping in mind that it is free!):

BMW M3

BMW M3

Well 66% of all people are still driving the Aztec. Now since I have slammed IE enough I should go into greater detail as to why it sucks, and give some alternatives.

Firefox 3.0

This looks to be the current favourite to unseat Internet Explorer as the browser champion. In its current state, it is hard to question Firefox's supremacy in the browser race.  Firefox is based off the old open source code base of the now defunct Netscape project.

Firefox has a lot going for it. It is a very fast browser, especially in comparison to IE. It should be getting even faster after the upcoming release of FireFox 3.5, which should come with the TraceMonkey JavaScript engine enabled. Yet if you are looking for pure speed, Firefox is not the king. Where FireFox wins hands down, is its extensibility.

Firefox has a vast theme and plugin catalog (created by everyday users) to be able to make the browser do whatever you want it to do. The Firefox themes allow you to change the appearance of the browser to suit your personal tastes.

Beyond the appearance, the plugins capability of Firefox, allows you to add functionality to suit your needs. Email notifier? Yep Gmail notifier handles that. Ad Block Plus blocks ads. GMarks integrates with you Google Bookmarks. The list is never ending, there is a Better Gmail plugin, that ads features to Gmail. Plugins for improving google reader, links to del-i-cious, digg, you name it. You  can make firefox do pretty much anything you want, and that is its strength.

Most importantlyFirefox is standards based. This means that it renders web pages to look the way a published set of standards dictate they should look. Differences from the published standards are treated as bugs by the Firefox developers.

Also important to note is that Firefox is available on all computing platforms.

Google Chrome

Google Chrome is in it's infancy. It was only released in beta form in September of 2008. It has a singular goal in optimizing browser performance to bring web-apps to the desktop. Google has a great deal invested in web applications (Google Docs, GMail, etc...) and to make them truly compete with desktop applications they felt they needed a faster browser; which is exactly what Google Chrome is.

Chrome has far and away the fastest Javascript engine on the market (name V8). The javascript processing time of a browser is crucial to the performance of the newer web applications. Beyond that there are many other advancements. The name chrome comes from the fact that that is exactly what it is lacking, the chrome. It tries to give as much content as possible content of websites as opposed to the browser itself. As well each tab in the browser operates in a seperate process. This means that if a bit of bad javascript crashes the browser, in Chrome it will only crash the single tab, rather than all existing tabs.

Chrome's biggest short comings are the strengths of Firefox. It lacks customizability, although a plugin in frastructure is coming. As well for the time being it is only available on Windoze although OS X and linux versions are in the pipeline.

Regardless of the current small market share of Chrome, I think that it actually has the best shot of unseeding IE. Google is pushing this browser very hard, they have taken it out of the beta state remarkably quickly for a Google product. They are marketing it a huge amount; they are even rumoured to be taking out television ads. Beyond the advertising they are said to be negotiating with computer manufacturers to OEM Chrome, which would be a major coup against IE.

Chrome is my browser of choice on Windoze.

Safari

Safari is Apple's answer to the browser. It started out as being OS X only, but has now been extended to the windows platform. Like Firefox and Chrome it is standards based, as well it is a very fast browser, yet it does not compete with Chrome. Yet it is faster than Firefox on OS X, and very comparable on Windoze.

Where Safari lacks, is it does not seem to be a polished application on the Windoze platform, and it lacks the extensibility of Firefox. Safari is very close to being my browser of choice on OS X, but with the upcoming version of Firefox, I think  I will continue with it.

Internet Explorer

Saving the worst piece of shit for last. This browser is everything that is wrong with the internet, and it is leading the downfall of Microsoft. The only thing that is has going for it is the update infrastructure being tied in with Windows Update so that it can be pushed to the client in a corporate setting. Other than that! It's a nightmare.

Is it standards based? Nope. Internet Explorer says FUCK YOU to standards. You create a website according to the web standards and it will work in Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera, ... pretty much every browser EXCEPT IE. You need to put in all kinds of conditional work to make the website look good in Internet Explorer.

Is it fast? Nope, one of the slowest browsers on the market.

Is it extensible? There is a growing amount of plugins, but it is extremely limited in comparison to Firefox.

Available on all platforms? Nope it is windoze only. A few years back there was an attempt to create a Mac version, but that one was even more fucked up then the windows version.

So with all the shittyness spewing out of IE why does it have the most market share? The easy answer: People are too stupid/lazy to download a far superior browser. I have high hopes that when Chrome starts being bundled on OEM machines (hopefully Dell and HP) then we may see IE die the death it so richly deserves.

In short, when picking a browser pick ANYTHING except Internet Explorer!

15May/091

Google Bookmarks

I am going to be writing a little bit about things that I have found that make my life easier. This is one google product that I have been using and loving , yet it doesn't seem to get any publicity;  it's Google Bookmarks.

I had been looking for a while for a way to handle my bookmarks. There are options out there. Apple's MobileMe will sync your bookmarks to the cloud, but it didn't seem to have a solution with Windows (and thus my work machines),  there are tons of linking services; Digg, Delicious, etc... But those were all social bookmarking. I wanted something that was in the cloud, that was private, easily organizable. I thought to myself: Why the hell does Google not do bookmarks?!?!? Which led me to wonder if they did.

I did a quick search for 'Google Bookmarks' and sure enough there it is! It lacks the spit and polish of most of their products, but it is quickly working its way up my favorite products list. You see I was sick and tired of emailing myself links that I found at work, or at other's computers. It would be something like, see an interesting link off a blog, follow a few more pages, bam! This is a great tutorial! Now I need to get that tutorial to somewhere I will remember it, and that I could easily find it again. That was done through tags in Google Reader or through emailing it to myself, both of whice were crappy solutions.

Now I just use Google's booksmarks service. The key is placing a link (this one: Bookmark This Page - you can just drag it to your bar), in your bookmark bar in your browser. When you click it, it will open a dialog box with the information of the current page in it. You can add coma seperated tags, and add a description. Clicking OK adds it to your bookmarks, which is accessible at: http://www.google.com/bookmarks/. This gives you a similar searching and browsing structure as GMail.

I absolutely love that I have all my bookmarks with me at all times. It is also very very easy to add a new link to the system. It really is a simple yet elegant solution to my problem. Are there are any other solutions that you like? This may not be typical Google clean, but it certainly the best solution that I have found.

20Feb/091

So Pissed At IE!

Why the hell does Internet Explorer never fucking work?

Ever!

Gah. Honestly, I am thinking of blocking IE from viewing this site! Opinions?

Filed under: Technology 1 Comment