Tyler (Everything)

29Jan/102

iPad Version 1.0 = Nope!

I have been digesting the release of the iPad for a few days now, and let me say my first impression is not magical.

After all the hype leading into a the tablet release I figured it would either be a big win or a big loss. Somehow it has come out as neither. Let me go through some initial impressions (keeping in mind I haven't touched the thing, and that seems to be the real factor in Apple product design).

  • The name sucks. Someone should be fired for iPad. iTablet, iSlate, iBigiPodTouch! Ok maybe the last one is worse
  • It looks like it should be awesome for web surfing, mobile device that has room for real websites
    • IT CAN'T USE REAL WEBSITES BECAUSE IT DOESN'T HAVE FLASH SUPPORT!
  • It attempts to be a game changer for eBooks, but I can't see myself reading a full book on a backlighted device. I still like the idea of e-ink
  • Battery life = 10 hours of video watching! WOW
  • Video output = VGA?!?!?! Seriously?
  • Support for bluetooth keyboard is awesome, very smart move by Apple
  • No multitasking? I actually think that this one will be dealt with with the release of iPhone OS 4.0, but until then... nope.
  • Looks awesome for watching video.
    • It is seriously crippled for watching web video (cept for Vimeo, and YouTube)... NO FLASH!
  • I am impressed that they can sell it for $499
  • IPS capacitive display, they can't be making much money on this thing
  • The hands on videos make it look very responsive as opposed to my iPhone 3G (no S)
  • The UI is a bag of crap. It looks like they are running the iPhone OS on a device it wasn't designed for... Oh wait that is what they are doing.
  • The apps they have redesigned for the iPad (contacts, maps, mail) look quite good!

All in all I'm not buying this version of the iPad. Our household has 2 iPhones, and 1 MacBook Pro. To be honest there is a perfect position in the household for a device of this sort. When I am gone with the laptop it would be good if the house had something better than an iPhone for checking email/web. Unfortunately with some of the very blatant limitations the iPad is not a significant enough improvement over the iPhone to justify the purchase.

Perhaps the next version of it that will no doubt deal with a lot of these issues, but not version 1.0. This reminds me of the original iPhone launch. $599 for the 4GB version. 3 months later the 4GB version was gone and the 8GB was selling for $399. Maybe then... If it gets (limited) multitasking and flash and a better UI.

All these things should be solvable with the release of OS 4.0

Comments (2) Trackbacks (0)
  1. The iPad is the device I have wanted since first getting an iPod touch. Yesterday there were 3 times where having the iPad would have been the exact device I needed.

    The fact that Safari mobile doesn’t support flash doesn’t bother me because my hatred of flash based websites overpowers my desire to watch most internet videos without having to use an app.

    The e-ink technology does have promise and I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised to see it become a dominant format for textbooks in schools. The devices I have seen look durable and light weight.

  2. A lot of things

    -epic name fail-agreed
    -would be nice to see flash integrated into iPod touch and iPhone
    -the difference between iPod touch and iPad is not enough for me to want to buy it (not that I have the money anyways)
    -keyboard integration is definately cool as well as the case you can buy
    -what I don’t like is the portability level (unless you have one of thos huge purses)
    -it also should really have some sort of camera so it could also become Apple’s e-book along with an iChat app with txt & video conference (txt only for iPod touch & iPhone)
    -Backlit e-book would be hard on the eyes.
    -awsome calender & e-mail
    -1 function at a time sucks
    -sorry for random order 


Leave a comment

(required)

No trackbacks yet.